Justice John Tsoho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has refused the Federal Government’s application to completely shield witnesses in the trial of the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mr Nnamdi Kanu, who is facing a six-count treason charge.
The prosecution had, in the motion it filed before Justice Tsoho, complained that all the witnesses lined up to testify against Kanu and two other pro-Biafra agitators, Benjamin Madubugwu and David Nwawuisi, who are facing trial with him, have declined to appear in court.
It said the witnesses insisted that they would not testify against the defendants unless their safety was guaranteed.
As a result, the prosecution counsel, Mr David Kaswe, urged the court to issue an order protecting the identities of the witnesses by allowing them to either wear facial masks or to testify behind screens.
The prosecution also asked for an order excluding persons except journalists from witnessing the proceedings.
Meanwhile, Kanu, through his lawyer, Chief Chuks Muoma (SAN), opposed the application which he said, grossly lacked merit.
He argued that section 36(4) of the 1999 Constitution made no provision for masquerades to testify in a trial involving an alleged act of treason.
“An accused person under our jurisprudence and justice administration must be confronted with his accusers eye-ball to eye-ball.
“My lord, we operate an accusatorial system of procedure under the common law. Justice must not only be done but must be seen to have been done.
“It is not within commonsense to malign and accuse someone in public and apply to try him in the bedroom. Having been accused in public, we want to also be tried in public.“We therefore urge this court not to allow masquerades to testify before it; we want to see their faces and ask them questions. As masquerades, how will the court be able to gauge their demeanour and body language? Is it by the rhythm of their dance steps?